Pages

Thursday, October 18, 2012

This Land, this demon

From the Upcoming One Off Mag


The people of this land. He had read that their beliefs far preceded the young prophet's young religion. For they were the people of the open sky, the open land; for they sought to lie their bodies bare to the outside, which is survival; their lives were nothing preciously given to them, their lives were something that happened to: life. Survival happened to their bodies, and through it all, they sang of their deaths. This long, they had sung that same tired song, and sang it loud enough to lie open the mountans to it, long enough that it was buried in the land, where it was crushed by the mountains and broke down and became the oil that gave its power to a new people, a young hungry pale people who heard that distillation of that song through that oil and obeyed it, and built its cities around it, and made that demon flesh once again.


What demon? This demon: an elder darkness, a hidden cause, the prehistoric invader who found this land, guided by the sun; around this primordial outsider were the bodies we built, this rock we covered, these streets we laid, solid enough to call them ourselves. This djinn is slowly, geologically, prepping us for openness once again. Succubus of the earth, smokestack of the spine, a belching industry beholden to the sun, in whose eruption speaks submission to the paleolithic. A thriving answer to hunger: The opaque void of the Old Ones, alighting within our air, a lost memory, a thriving-to-extinction, a saccherine overabundance. This Becoming-exxon is internal combusion. It lept out of the well, submitted itself to be burned, lent its fury to new machines, enabled new addictions, flung asphault across the earth, transformed the skies into its own image. A lesser demon Druj, slouching from the depths to satiate our survival.

What does supplication say to the skies that has not already been said in the soil?

The desert had lost its grounding function and become a dry mist, thickening itself. It ceased to be land and became a field, infected with fronts, zones, fluid borders, as viscous primordial black blob of light beneath became buffetted by the wind released under the wings of the quadcopter. An invading, permeating storm: Drug. An overkill of the land taken flight. What submitted itself to be burned within those engines, what lent its fury to those machines, what transforms the skies into its own image, what slouches from the depths of the earth, whose name means riches, whose wealth is combustible?
The message is the machine, the delivery is the object. Accumulation is its own reward.


-=- jed -=- feedback please appreciated muchly. 

10 comments:

  1. Hi Jed, I like this a great deal; it does need editing on a formal level but that's not important here. The abstraction really works for me, the last line is perfect - saying 'the delivery is the object' also implies that the object is dynamic, not an object at all, but as you say, accumulation - that itself is dynamic, sludge. You have Druj (drudge?) and Drug in parallel which works well.

    Part of it sounds like Lovecraft and I'd take things like 'Old Ones' out - on the other hand 'Becoming-exxon' is wonderful; there's a hint of Deleuze-Guattari's work here - do you know it?

    The way this is reading, abstract movements of land and soil and death ('overkill' for example) is beautiful.

    I hope others comment on this and if you have any specific questions, please let me know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. haha the second "drug" is a typo...fixing that now in my version, I'll let this stand for now.
    When you say "editing on a formal level" can you expand on that idea? I don't want to respond to something that I don't understand, to make it sort of readable on a rational level would indeed take a LOT of work (or perhaps should never happen) but I have been wondering whether a piece like this could ever stand alone in its slight incomprehensibility as a sort of essay-painting.

    You're exactly right to hit on Lovecraft. I love Lovecraft myself, and also I've been deeply influenced (IE stealing a lot of ideas and language from) this book called Cyclonopedia by Reza Negarestani, that is among many other things a reading of Lovecraftian demonology etc., he's part of a philosophical movement school that might just be Nick Land and himself that uses Lovecraft as a sort of central almost biblical starting place text. A subsection of speculative materialism. You would LOVE that book, you should order a copy (it's impossible to find in bookstores so just use the internetz). They, like me, discuss and respond to D & G.

    Druj is a pre-Islamic, pre-Aryan, Persian name for a female arch-demon or djinn

    Yes, I did a thesis on Deleuze & Guattari & they deeply influenced my thinking http://jedbickman.com/#b0e/custom_plain

    The Becoming- idea is also from Heidegger as well, of course; want to make sure we give all the props to all our forebears while we're on the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've had the Reza book but honestly couldn't get through it; I also have Nick Land's work and participated by remote in one of the Warwick conferences. I have problems with the dense neologisms - I get more from Mike Davis, J.G. Ballard, etc. on the world. I did think I detected D&G! Is the reference to Druj in Reza? I should take a look at this.

    Along the same lines, have you read the Chapman brothers' work? Their art is also amazing.

    Lovecraft, speaking of racists, was pretty much of one; I read into him at one point, and it was disappointing. I'm not using the term lightly - I might be able to come up with the reference.

    Ok, some edit stuff - should it be (I'm not sure) - lie open the mountains, or lay open the mountains? You have as viscous primordial black blob of light beneath became - should that be a viscous? I understand the dropping of articles but it tangled the sentence for me. Asphalt is spelled (at least in the US) like that, not asphault - was that deliberate, playing on fault? With had lost its grounding function and become a dry mist, - the become reads odd although it's correct, maybe had become or became would work better? Maybe not? With Drug or Druj, this reminds me of a problem I have (not with you) with Lovecraft, which is a kind of exoticism he pastes in all his work.

    I guess I don't like Lovecraft; I lived in Providence, went to Brown, where there was quite a cult of him. The racism (which was in, if I remember, his letters) has turned me off, the piling-on of uncanny names, etc. for effect did the same. But I've never responded to the Necromicon or Crowley, etc. either...

    Want to look at the thesis and thanks!

    - Alan

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you should put up the URLs in your journalism you think are relevant - I'm really impressed obviously, and already disgusted by Project Prevention. ARGH!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Finally, you're in Brooklyn? We should all get together - we're across the street from the Barclay Center -

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jed, I like this very much. Very evocative. You and Alan are more well-read than I so much of the discussion is new to me, though quite intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I hope we can continue this dialog - I was saying today that I find both of you way ahead of me; we can all learn from each other. I have no idea where the rest of the class is or why there hasn't been responses - or why people never even answered the email. Maybe vagueness, but I didn't have this trouble last cycle. I'll send out email again tonight - and Sylvia, your background is amazing as well -

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah, you're right, Lovecraft was SUPER racist. No doubt about that. It's so cool you've already come across Negarestani & Nick Land etc., not many have. Yes, let's hang out in brooklyn! I'm around all the time. I'm in crown heights.
    OK, I gotta look at some of the newer posts.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Also thanks for the edits. Vocationally I'm a copyeditor and yet I am literally incapable of really reading my own words. It's some cognitive block that's perhaps interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've been a copy-editor myself and have the same problem. I also tend to make assumptions in my writing that other people might now -and that take someone else to catch. Maybe next week we can meet? We'll have a bit more time then.
    Thanks, Alan

    ReplyDelete